PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLVI vs. DJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLVI vs. DJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 30.63% return.


XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DJP

1D
0.02%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
30.63%
6M
29.34%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVI vs. DJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLVI and DJP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLVI vs. DJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVI

DJP
DJP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVI vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLVI vs. DJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVIDJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.00

+1.32

Drawdowns

XLVI vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and DJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVIDJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-78.35%

+70.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-32.82%

+28.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-50.86%

+48.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

Volatility

XLVI vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVIDJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

18.92%

-7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

18.96%

-8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

17.06%

-6.12%

XLVI vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLVI vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison

XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, while DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLVI and DJP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DJP.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 0.00% for DJP.

XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DJP is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.70% for DJP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLVI and DJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer