XLVI vs. VHT
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. XLVI is actively managed, while VHT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VHT.
Performance
XLVI vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.81% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VHT
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -4.41%
- 1Y
- 13.73%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
XLVI vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -1.33% | 12.79% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -4.81% | 17.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and VHT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.95 |
XLVI vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
VHT
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
VHT
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Energy
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Healthcare
XLVI
-
VHT
Industrials
XLVI
-
VHT
Real Estate
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Technology
XLVI
-
VHT
Utilities
XLVI
-
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
VHT
XLVI vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLVI | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.56 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum VHT drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -39.12% | +30.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -7.83% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -5.99% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 14.32% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 14.96% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 16.94% | -6.00% |
XLVI vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, more than VHT's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.72% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.61% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLVI and VHT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.61%, compared with 1.72% for VHT.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.10% for VHT.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer