XLVI vs. FXH
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and FXH (First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while FXH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Health Care Index. XLVI is actively managed, while FXH is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FXH.
Performance
XLVI vs. FXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than FXH's 2.70% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
XLVI vs. FXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.50% | 12.41% |
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 2.70% | 13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and FXH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.75 |
XLVI vs. FXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
FXH
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
FXH
-
Healthcare
XLVI
FXH
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Energy
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Industrials
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Real Estate
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Technology
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Utilities
XLVI
-
FXH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. FXH — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXH
XLVI vs. FXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLVI | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. FXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum FXH drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and FXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -43.70% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -7.26% | +6.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -9.45% | +7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. FXH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | FXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 16.03% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 16.56% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 18.47% | -7.41% |
XLVI vs. FXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FXH's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. FXH - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, more than FXH's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.83% | 0.75% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.20% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.17% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and FXH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 0.83% for FXH.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FXH is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.61% for FXH.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and FXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer