PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLVI vs. TMED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLVI vs. TMED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than TMED's 2.81% return.


XLVI

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMED

1D
-2.33%
1M
1.95%
YTD
2.81%
6M
4.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVI vs. TMED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLVI and TMED is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLVI vs. TMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLVI vs. TMED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVITMEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Drawdowns

XLVI vs. TMED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum TMED drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and TMED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVITMEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-11.11%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-3.75%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-2.59%

+0.65%

Volatility

XLVI vs. TMED - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVITMEDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

18.05%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

18.05%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

18.05%

-7.11%

XLVI vs. TMED - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMED's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLVI vs. TMED - Dividend Comparison

XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, more than TMED's 0.53% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLVI and TMED have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.61%, compared with 0.53% for TMED.

XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while TMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.44% for TMED.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLVI and TMED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer