DJP vs. COMT
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT).
DJP and COMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2006. COMT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 15, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DJP or COMT.
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and COMT is -0.89. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
DJP vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DJP:
0.17
COMT:
-0.45
DJP:
0.34
COMT:
-0.52
DJP:
1.04
COMT:
0.94
DJP:
0.04
COMT:
-0.26
DJP:
0.40
COMT:
-1.38
DJP:
6.31%
COMT:
5.03%
DJP:
14.78%
COMT:
15.37%
DJP:
-78.35%
COMT:
-51.89%
DJP:
-54.97%
COMT:
-23.24%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than COMT's -3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DJP has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of 1.38%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.66% annualized return.
DJP
2.62%
-4.63%
-0.12%
2.49%
14.57%
1.38%
COMT
-3.08%
-3.31%
-5.14%
-7.53%
13.22%
2.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DJP vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DJP vs. COMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DJP
COMT
DJP vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DJP vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
---|
Drawdowns
DJP vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and COMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DJP vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) is NaN%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that DJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with DJP or COMT
Recent discussions
VUG vs FOCPX
FOCPX vs VUG is absolutely incorrect. I ran the same comparison on Morning star and FOCPX has out performed but your graph shows the opposite.
what is the source of this data. is it trust worthy.
SK
Feature idea - suggesting new diversified best risk/return options for a portfolio ?
Hi Dimitry,
Do you have any plans to add recommended instruments that will provide better diversification and risk/return for a portfolio like some other sites do ? They claim to do this based on expected future performance, but even based on past performance and past diversification may be a good start ?
RB
AI
Farshad