XLVI vs. XLV
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. XLVI is actively managed, while XLV is passively managed. Over the past year, XLVI returned 23.20% vs 26.13% for XLV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XLVI vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 5.90% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.35%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43B | $1.62B | $1.62B | |
| $951.77K | $684.72K | $477.94K |
XLVI vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.10% | 12.41% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.90% | 16.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and XLV is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XLVI and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLVI vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
XLV
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
XLV
-
Healthcare
XLVI
XLV
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Energy
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Industrials
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Technology
XLVI
-
XLV
Utilities
XLVI
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
XLV
XLVI vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLVI | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.57 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 6.15 | +2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -39.17% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -10.47% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -2.82% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -7.09% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 4.37% | -1.50% |
Volatility
XLVI vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) is 3.38%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that XLVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 6.03% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 12.07% | -3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 15.90% | -4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 15.04% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 16.66% | -5.61% |
XLVI vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.80%, more than XLV's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.56% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.80% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLVI and XLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XLV has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to XLVI (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLVI dropped -8.14% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 1-year performance, XLV leads with 26.13% vs 23.20% for XLVI. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XLV has performed better with a 26.13% return vs 23.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.80%, compared with 1.56% for XLV.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.08% for XLV.
XLVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer