PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLVI vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLVI vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 5.90% return.


XLVI

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.17%
6M
6.83%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.35%

XLV

1D
-0.59%
1M
-0.73%
6M
5.94%
YTD
5.90%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43B$1.62B$1.62B
$951.77K$684.72K$477.94K

XLVI vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLVI and XLV is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.95

The correlation between XLVI and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLVI vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLVI
XLV

Financial Services

100.6%

-

Healthcare

100.0%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLVI
100.6%
XLV

-

Healthcare

XLVI
100.0%
XLV
99.4%

Basic Materials

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Communication Services

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Energy

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Industrials

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Real Estate

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Technology

XLVI

-

XLV
0.5%

Utilities

XLVI

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLVI vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLVI
XLVI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XLVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLVI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XLVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLVI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLVI vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVIXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.57

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

6.15

+2.22

XLVI vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLVI and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLVI vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVIXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-39.17%

+31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-10.47%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.82%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-7.09%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

4.37%

-1.50%

Volatility

XLVI vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) is 3.38%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that XLVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVIXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

6.03%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

12.07%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

15.90%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

15.04%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.05%

16.66%

-5.61%

XLVI vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLVI vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.80%, more than XLV's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.56%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%
XLVI
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.80%5.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XLVI and XLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLV has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to XLVI (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLVI dropped -8.14% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 1-year performance, XLV leads with 26.13% vs 23.20% for XLVI. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XLV has performed better with a 26.13% return vs 23.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.80%, compared with 1.56% for XLV.

XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.08% for XLV.

XLVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLVI and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer