DJP vs. HYDW
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW).
DJP and HYDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2006. HYDW is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2018. Both DJP and HYDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DJP or HYDW.
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and HYDW is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DJP vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DJP:
0.27
HYDW:
1.50
DJP:
0.48
HYDW:
2.13
DJP:
1.05
HYDW:
1.28
DJP:
0.06
HYDW:
3.02
DJP:
0.59
HYDW:
9.72
DJP:
6.19%
HYDW:
0.59%
DJP:
13.51%
HYDW:
3.79%
DJP:
-78.35%
HYDW:
-17.75%
DJP:
-56.86%
HYDW:
-1.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than HYDW's 5.40% return.
DJP
3.82%
-0.94%
-2.35%
3.21%
6.83%
0.22%
HYDW
5.40%
-0.21%
3.02%
5.32%
2.97%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DJP vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDW's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DJP vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DJP vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 4.86% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.46% | 4.56% | 4.42% |
Drawdowns
DJP vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than HYDW's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and HYDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DJP vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) at 1.29%. This indicates that DJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.