DJP vs. DBC
DJP (iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both Commodities funds - DJP tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index while DBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DJP returned 7.35%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for DBC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DJP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
DJP vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 30.60% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 34.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DJP has underperformed DBC with an annualized return of 7.35%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.
DJP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 30.60%
- 6M
- 29.88%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
DBC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 34.70%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- 1Y
- 46.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
DJP vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 30.60% | 17.20% | 5.59% | -9.85% | 17.46% | 31.05% | -4.12% | 7.63% | -13.07% | 0.74% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 34.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and DBC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DJP and DBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJP vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
DJP
DBC
DJP vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJP | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | 2.48 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 3.17 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.63 | 6.97 | -1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 14.90 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJP | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.48 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.12 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
DJP vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, roughly equal to the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJP | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.35% | -76.36% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -7.05% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -13.82% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | -27.34% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.36% | -41.71% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.83% | -22.08% | -10.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.87% | -46.22% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.30% | +0.04% |
Volatility
DJP vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) is 6.03%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that DJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJP | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 6.67% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 15.75% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 18.78% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 19.18% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 17.81% | -0.74% |
DJP vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJP vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.47% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DJP and DBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DBC has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to DJP (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJP dropped -78.35% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 10-year performance, DBC leads with 9.04% vs 7.35% for DJP. On fees, DJP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBC has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.00% for DJP.
DJP tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DJP and 0.85% for DBC.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJP and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer