XLVI vs. BCD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.

Performance

XLVI vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.64% return.

XLVI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCD

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 6M: 21.15%
• 1Y: 32.33%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVI vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	-1.33%	12.79%
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	20.64%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XLVI and BCD is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

XLVI vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCD

BCD Risk / Return Rank: 73
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVI vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLVI	BCD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.67	+0.58

Drawdowns

XLVI vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and BCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLVI	BCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-29.81%	+21.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-3.44%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-9.86%	+7.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLVI	BCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	13.83%	-2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	15.42%	-4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.94%	13.90%	-2.96%

XLVI vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLVI vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, less than BCD's 14.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.27%	17.21%	3.60%	4.51%	5.21%	8.30%	1.29%	1.55%	1.59%	0.07%
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.61%	5.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLVI and BCD in my portfolio?

XLVI and BCD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLVI or BCD?

On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLVI or BCD?

BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLVI or BCD?

BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.27%, compared with 11.61% for XLVI.

What is the main difference between XLVI and BCD?

XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.29% for BCD.