BCD vs. DBA
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA).
BCD and DBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCD is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007.
Performance
BCD vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCD vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.57% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 7.05% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -5.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 15.57% return, which is significantly higher than DBA's 7.05% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- 1Y
- 22.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
DBA
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCD vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
DBA
BCD vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCD | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.62 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.97 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.87 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 1.63 | +5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCD | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.62 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.91 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.09 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and DBA is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BCD vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.89%, more than DBA's 3.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.89% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.34% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCD vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and DBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -67.97% | +38.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -7.99% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | -15.94% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -24.64% | +22.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -41.26% | +31.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 4.26% | -1.15% |
Volatility
BCD vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 2.55%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 2.55% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 6.53% | +5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.15% | 12.09% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 14.25% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 13.13% | +0.80% |