BCD vs. DBA
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA).
BCD and DBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCD is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BCD or DBA.
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and DBA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BCD vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BCD:
-0.11
DBA:
1.74
BCD:
-0.08
DBA:
2.34
BCD:
0.99
DBA:
1.30
BCD:
-0.06
DBA:
0.63
BCD:
-0.27
DBA:
5.35
BCD:
4.90%
DBA:
5.55%
BCD:
11.39%
DBA:
17.10%
BCD:
-29.79%
DBA:
-67.97%
BCD:
-20.44%
DBA:
-30.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 31.77% return.
BCD
-0.05%
-4.93%
-7.24%
-0.31%
8.85%
N/A
DBA
31.77%
4.23%
10.11%
31.27%
11.94%
1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCD vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BCD vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BCD vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCD nor DBA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 0.00% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.00% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BCD vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum DBA drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and DBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BCD vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 3.40%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.