XLVI vs. FMED
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while FMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FMED.
Performance
XLVI vs. FMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than FMED's -0.22% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMED
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 9.04%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI vs. FMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.99% | 12.41% |
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | -0.22% | 13.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and FMED is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.59 |
XLVI vs. FMED - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
FMED
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
FMED
-
Healthcare
XLVI
FMED
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Energy
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Industrials
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Real Estate
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Technology
XLVI
-
FMED
Utilities
XLVI
-
FMED
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. FMED — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FMED
XLVI vs. FMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLVI | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. FMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum FMED drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and FMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -21.84% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -6.40% | +5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -7.10% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.39% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. FMED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | FMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 19.40% | -8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 18.57% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 18.57% | -7.52% |
XLVI vs. FMED - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FMED's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. FMED - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, while FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.12% | 5.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and FMED have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FMED.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.12%, compared with 0.00% for FMED.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.50% for FMED.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and FMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer