BCD vs. PFFA
BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCD is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while PFFA is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Virtus. BCD is passively managed, while PFFA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCD returned 10.65%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for PFFA. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BCD charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PFFA.
Performance
BCD vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 1.20% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.82%
PFFA
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.39M | $1.55M | $2.26M | |
| $15.74M | $17.23M | $20.45M |
BCD vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 16.41% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -12.97% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 1.20% | 8.22% | 16.11% | 26.45% | -20.91% | 23.53% | -7.87% | 31.99% | -7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and PFFA is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BCD and PFFA shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
PFFA
BCD vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCD | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.89 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 2.56 | +4.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCD vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and PFFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -70.52% | +40.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -6.49% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -12.15% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | -22.70% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -3.29% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -6.57% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 2.25% | +1.63% |
Volatility
BCD vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 2.32%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | PFFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 2.32% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 6.46% | +5.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.22% | 7.62% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 11.59% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 31.55% | -17.64% |
BCD vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCD vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.79%, more than PFFA's 9.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.79% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.98% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCD and PFFA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCD has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to PFFA (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs PFFA's -70.52%.
On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 10.65% vs 5.57% for PFFA. On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.79%, compared with 9.98% for PFFA.
BCD is categorized as Commodities, while PFFA is Preferred Stock. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BCD and 1.47% for PFFA.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCD and PFFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer