XLKI vs. IGV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLKI is actively managed, while IGV is passively managed. Over the past year, XLKI returned 24.59% vs -12.92% for IGV. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XLKI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.

Performance

XLKI vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -10.50% return.

XLKI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 1Y: 24.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.71%

IGV

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 4.75%
• YTD: -10.50%
• 1Y: -12.92%
• 3Y*: 9.07%
• 5Y*: 3.25%
• 10Y*: 15.95%
• ALL TIME*: 9.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	$1.45B	$1.32B	$1.70B
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$514.98K	$430.22K	$356.64K

XLKI vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.67%	10.02%
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	-10.50%	-6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKI and IGV is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.49

XLKI vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLKI	IGV
Financial Services	99.9%	1.9%
Technology	99.2%	89.3%
Communication Services	0.8%	8.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLKI vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLKI

XLKI Risk / Return Rank: 51
XLKI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XLKI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XLKI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XLKI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XLKI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

IGV

IGV Risk / Return Rank: 5
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLKI vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLKI	IGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	-0.53	+1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	-0.58	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.93	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	-0.42	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.10	-0.79	+7.89

XLKI vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKI Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKI and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLKI vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -11.21%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and IGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLKI	IGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.21%	-63.45%	+52.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.21%	-36.61%	+25.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-19.69%	+12.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-14.49%	+12.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	19.35%	-16.17%

Volatility

XLKI vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 6.80%. This indicates that XLKI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLKI	IGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	6.80%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	25.02%	-7.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.96%	29.16%	-9.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.92%	28.16%	-8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	26.45%	-6.53%

XLKI vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLKI vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.91%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.35%	0.02%	0.16%	0.09%	0.82%	0.22%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	17.91%	8.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLKI and IGV in my portfolio?

XLKI and IGV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLKI or IGV?

XLKI has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to IGV (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLKI dropped -11.21% vs IGV's -63.45%.

Which ETF is better, XLKI or IGV?

On 1-year performance, XLKI leads with 24.59% vs -12.92% for IGV. On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 6.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLKI or IGV?

Over the 1-year period, XLKI has performed better with a 24.59% return vs -12.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLKI or IGV?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLKI or IGV?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.91%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.

What is the main difference between XLKI and IGV?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.39% for IGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLKI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.