XLII vs. FOWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. XLII is actively managed, while FOWF is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.

Performance

XLII vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than FOWF's 9.44% return.

XLII

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOWF

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 12.30%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	6.73%	6.62%
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	9.44%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XLII and FOWF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.69

XLII vs. FOWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLII	FOWF
Financial Services	100.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Communication Services	-	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	62.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	29.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLII vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOWF

FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 46
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLII vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLII	FOWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.63	-0.19

Drawdowns

XLII vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum FOWF drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and FOWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLII	FOWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-12.29%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-2.81%	+2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-2.05%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLII	FOWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.55%	13.94%	-2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.55%	16.89%	-5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.55%	16.89%	-5.34%

XLII vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLII vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than FOWF's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	0.73%	0.79%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.29%	5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLII and FOWF in my portfolio?

XLII and FOWF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLII or FOWF?

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLII or FOWF?

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FOWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLII or FOWF?

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.73% for FOWF.

What is the main difference between XLII and FOWF?

XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while FOWF is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.49% for FOWF.