FOWF vs. HWAY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and HWAY (Themes US Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while HWAY is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 21.09% vs 32.92% for HWAY. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HWAY.

Performance

FOWF vs. HWAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than HWAY's 22.94% return.

FOWF

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 2.66%
• 6M: 5.55%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 1Y: 21.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.28%

HWAY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.03%
• 6M: 14.83%
• YTD: 22.94%
• 1Y: 32.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	$26.08K	$101.42K	$97.71K
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	$22.82K	$23.54K	$29.88K

FOWF vs. HWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	13.73%	29.15%	-2.02%
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	22.94%	19.99%	-4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FOWF and HWAY is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.60

The correlation between FOWF and HWAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

FOWF vs. HWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FOWF	HWAY
Industrials	60.9%	77.9%
Technology	30.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	20.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

FOWF vs. HWAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOWF

FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 55
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

HWAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOWF vs. HWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FOWF	HWAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.45	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.11	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	2.36	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	7.98	-2.04

FOWF vs. HWAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOWF Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the HWAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOWF and HWAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FOWF vs. HWAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum HWAY drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and HWAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FOWF	HWAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.29%	-25.96%	+13.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-12.63%	+2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.57%	+4.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-5.20%	+3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.73%	-0.35%

Volatility

FOWF vs. HWAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is 4.06%, while Themes US Infrastructure ETF (HWAY) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that FOWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FOWF	HWAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	4.71%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	16.68%	-4.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	20.52%	-5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.79%	22.22%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	22.22%	-5.43%

FOWF vs. HWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HWAY's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FOWF vs. HWAY - Dividend Comparison

FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while HWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	0.73%	0.79%	0.00%
HWAY Themes US Infrastructure ETF	1.05%	1.29%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FOWF and HWAY in my portfolio?

FOWF and HWAY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FOWF or HWAY?

HWAY has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FOWF (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOWF dropped -12.29% vs HWAY's -25.96%.

Which ETF is better, FOWF or HWAY?

On 1-year performance, HWAY leads with 32.92% vs 21.09% for FOWF. On fees, HWAY is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FOWF has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FOWF or HWAY?

Over the 1-year period, HWAY has performed better with a 32.92% return vs 21.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FOWF or HWAY?

HWAY is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FOWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FOWF or HWAY?

HWAY has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.73% for FOWF.

What is the main difference between FOWF and HWAY?

FOWF is categorized as Industrials Equities, while HWAY is Infrastructure Equities. FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while HWAY tracks Solactive United States Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FOWF and 0.29% for HWAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HWAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.