FOWF vs. COWG
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while COWG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 24.00% for COWG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
FOWF vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's 3.05% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 21.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 3.05% | 10.24% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and COWG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FOWF and COWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
COWG
FOWF vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 1.40 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 2.01 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 2.02 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 5.94 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 1.40 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 1.05 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum COWG drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and COWG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -23.60% | +11.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -10.79% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -1.31% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -3.38% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 3.68% | -1.06% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) at 5.45%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 5.45% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 12.78% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 17.35% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 19.28% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 19.28% | -2.29% |
FOWF vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FOWF and COWG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
FOWF vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than COWG's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% |