XLII vs. AMDY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

XLII vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 101.34% return.

XLII

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: -4.73%
• 1M: 8.37%
• YTD: 101.34%
• 6M: 101.99%
• 1Y: 203.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	9.77%	6.30%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	101.34%	20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLII and AMDY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

XLII vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 90
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLII vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLII	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.82	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.53	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.58	—

Drawdowns

XLII vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLII	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.10%	-53.92%	+43.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-4.73%	+3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-17.78%	+16.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLII	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	56.19%	-44.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	46.93%	-34.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	46.93%	-34.74%

XLII vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLII vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, less than AMDY's 65.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	65.88%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	10.97%	5.47%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLII and AMDY in my portfolio?

XLII and AMDY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLII or AMDY?

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLII or AMDY?

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLII or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 65.88%, compared with 10.97% for XLII.

What is the main difference between XLII and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 1.23% for AMDY.