XLI vs. NOBL
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
XLI vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 14.15%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.94% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
XLI vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.43% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and NOBL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XLI and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLI vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
NOBL
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
XLI
NOBL
Utilities
XLI
NOBL
Technology
XLI
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
NOBL
Basic Materials
XLI
-
NOBL
Communication Services
XLI
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
NOBL
Energy
XLI
-
NOBL
Financial Services
XLI
-
NOBL
Healthcare
XLI
-
NOBL
Real Estate
XLI
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
NOBL
XLI vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.38 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 3.53 | +4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -35.43% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -9.11% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -15.36% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -17.92% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -35.43% | -6.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -2.43% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -3.48% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.56% | -0.47% |
Volatility
XLI vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 2.95% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 8.11% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 11.52% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 14.41% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 16.61% | +3.43% |
XLI vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLI vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and NOBL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 9.94% for NOBL. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.35% for NOBL.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer