PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 28.59% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 19.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 9.82%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.87% annualized return.


XLE

1D
-1.94%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
28.59%
6M
26.16%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
9.82%

CIBR

1D
2.67%
1M
14.20%
YTD
19.83%
6M
13.32%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
17.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.59%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
19.83%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and CIBR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.30

The correlation between XLE and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
CIBR

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

94.0%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLE
100.0%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Communication Services

XLE

-

CIBR
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Industrials

XLE

-

CIBR
3.5%

Real Estate

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Technology

XLE

-

CIBR
94.0%

Utilities

XLE

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLECIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

0.83

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

1.94

+6.63

XLE vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLECIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-33.89%

-37.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-21.99%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-21.99%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-33.89%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-33.89%

-32.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

-9.38%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-8.66%

-9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

9.36%

-5.07%

Volatility

XLE vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.22%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLECIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

12.35%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

21.72%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

25.16%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.06%

25.05%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

23.65%

+5.93%

XLE vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.48%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and CIBR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to XLE (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.87% vs 9.82% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.87% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.60% for CIBR.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer