XLC vs. PBUS
XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XLC tracks the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 8.28%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
XLC vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than PBUS's 10.82% return.
XLC
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
XLC vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.49% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.88% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -9.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and PBUS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XLC and PBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLC vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLC
PBUS
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
XLC
PBUS
Technology
XLC
PBUS
Basic Materials
XLC
-
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
XLC
-
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
XLC
-
PBUS
Energy
XLC
-
PBUS
Financial Services
XLC
-
PBUS
Healthcare
XLC
-
PBUS
Industrials
XLC
-
PBUS
Real Estate
XLC
-
PBUS
Utilities
XLC
-
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLC vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
XLC
PBUS
XLC vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.41 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.08 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 13.93 | -10.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.30 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.80 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
XLC vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than PBUS's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -33.15% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -9.02% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.97% | -19.07% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.65% | -25.40% | -21.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -0.64% | -5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -5.13% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.99% | +1.15% |
Volatility
XLC vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that XLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLC | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 2.94% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 9.13% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 12.06% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 17.05% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 19.33% | +2.87% |
XLC vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLC vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLC and PBUS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLC has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 13.48% vs 8.28% for XLC. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.
XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLC and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer