PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLC vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than MGK's 5.33% return.


XLC

1D
-0.42%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-4.85%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*

MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-4.85%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and MGK is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between XLC and MGK has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLC vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLC
MGK

Communication Services

95.1%
17.3%

Technology

4.7%
56.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

4.5%

Industrials

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Communication Services

XLC
95.1%
MGK
17.3%

Technology

XLC
4.7%
MGK
56.1%

Basic Materials

XLC

-

MGK
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XLC

-

MGK
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLC

-

MGK
0.4%

Energy

XLC

-

MGK

-

Financial Services

XLC

-

MGK
4.5%

Healthcare

XLC

-

MGK
4.5%

Industrials

XLC

-

MGK
1.1%

Real Estate

XLC

-

MGK
1.3%

Utilities

XLC

-

MGK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLC vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.37

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

4.65

-1.92

XLC vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLC vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, roughly equal to the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-48.43%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-16.85%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-23.36%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-36.01%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-5.63%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-7.58%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

4.97%

-1.64%

Volatility

XLC vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.57%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

5.96%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

13.29%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

16.87%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

22.72%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

21.93%

+0.24%

XLC vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLC vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.25%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLC and MGK have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 5-year performance, MGK leads with 14.87% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGK has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.05% for MGK.

MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLC and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer