XLC vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. XLC is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

XLC vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

XLC

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -3.46%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 11.67%
• 3Y*: 22.40%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	-4.49%	2.18%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and MEME is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.28

XLC vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLC	MEME
Communication Services	95.1%	5.5%
Technology	4.7%	58.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	4.8%
Financial Services	-	5.7%
Healthcare	-	5.4%
Industrials	-	29.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	10.7%

Return for Risk

XLC vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC

XLC Risk / Return Rank: 24
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLC	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLC	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.28	+0.25

Drawdowns

XLC vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, roughly equal to the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLC	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.65%	-48.78%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.36%	-5.93%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-29.90%	+19.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLC	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	74.19%	-60.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	74.19%	-53.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	74.19%	-51.99%

XLC vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLC vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	1.25%	1.13%	0.99%	0.82%	1.10%	0.74%	0.68%	0.82%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLC and MEME in my portfolio?

XLC and MEME have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLC or MEME?

On fees, XLC is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLC or MEME?

XLC is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLC or MEME?

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between XLC and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.69% for MEME.