XJR vs. OUSM
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - XJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index while OUSM tracks the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 5.38%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for OUSM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSM.
Performance
XJR vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.
XJR
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XJR vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 14.91% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 22.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and OUSM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XJR and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJR vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
OUSM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
XJR
OUSM
Technology
XJR
OUSM
Industrials
XJR
OUSM
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
OUSM
Healthcare
XJR
OUSM
Real Estate
XJR
OUSM
-
Energy
XJR
OUSM
Basic Materials
XJR
OUSM
Consumer Defensive
XJR
OUSM
Communication Services
XJR
OUSM
Utilities
XJR
OUSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
OUSM
XJR vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.19 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 3.47 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.83 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.46 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.48 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and OUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -39.84% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -9.21% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -19.44% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -19.44% | -7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.67% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -5.22% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.14% | -0.21% |
Volatility
XJR vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 3.66% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 9.25% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 13.15% | +4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 16.30% | +5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 18.94% | +2.79% |
XJR vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XJR vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJR and OUSM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XJR has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs OUSM's -39.84%.
On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 5.38% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.
XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.48% for OUSM.
XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and OUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer