PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. XJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XJR vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XJR vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
2.92%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
2.75%8.12%12.27%16.74%-14.36%23.43%29.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than XJH's 2.75% return.


XJR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.24%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*

XJH

1D
0.90%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
2.75%
6M
5.01%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XJR vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XJR and XJH have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XJH
XJH Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJRXJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.69

5.54

-0.85

XJR vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and XJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJRXJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.31

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and XJH is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XJR vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than XJH's 1.22% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.11%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.24%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.04%0.36%

Drawdowns

XJR vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, which is greater than XJH's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and XJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRXJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-25.07%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.40%

-14.02%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-25.07%

-2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-5.95%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-6.99%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.37%

+0.43%

Volatility

XJR vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) have volatilities of 6.38% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XJRXJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

6.71%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

12.27%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.47%

21.39%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

19.89%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

19.99%

+1.88%