XJR vs. IJR
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - XJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index while IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 5.65%/yr vs 5.90%/yr for IJR. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
XJR vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XJR having a 16.02% return and IJR slightly higher at 16.42%.
XJR
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- —
IJR
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
XJR vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 16.02% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 16.42% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 35.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and IJR is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XJR and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJR vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
IJR
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
XJR
IJR
Technology
XJR
IJR
Industrials
XJR
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
IJR
Healthcare
XJR
IJR
Real Estate
XJR
IJR
Energy
XJR
IJR
Basic Materials
XJR
IJR
Consumer Defensive
XJR
IJR
Communication Services
XJR
IJR
Utilities
XJR
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
IJR
XJR vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJR | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 2.00 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.88 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.96 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 13.21 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJR | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.00 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.28 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -58.15% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -8.68% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -28.02% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -28.02% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -9.28% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.60% | +0.33% |
Volatility
XJR vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 4.46%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.46% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 11.63% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 17.51% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 21.40% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 22.91% | -1.18% |
XJR vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJR vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than IJR's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XJR and IJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to IJR (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 5-year performance, IJR leads with 5.90% vs 5.65% for XJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IJR has performed better with a 5.90% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJR.
IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.98% for XJR.
XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.06% for IJR.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer