PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 20.76% return.


XJR

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.96%
YTD
19.44%
6M
17.14%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
0.00%
1M
2.33%
YTD
20.76%
6M
18.72%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
19.44%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
20.76%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%37.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and AVUV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.94

The correlation between XJR and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
AVUV

Financial Services

18.2%
26.1%

Technology

16.8%
7.4%

Industrials

15.5%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
18.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

7.6%
0.7%

Energy

4.7%
15.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
AVUV
26.1%

Technology

XJR
16.8%
AVUV
7.4%

Industrials

XJR
15.5%
AVUV
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.5%
AVUV
18.7%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
AVUV
4.8%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
AVUV
0.7%

Energy

XJR
4.7%
AVUV
15.8%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
AVUV
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.7%
AVUV
4.7%

Communication Services

XJR
2.5%
AVUV
3.1%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

4.85

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

14.37

-3.26

XJR vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-49.42%

+22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.95%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-28.79%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-28.79%

+1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.61%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-7.89%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.68%

+0.23%

Volatility

XJR vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.28%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

4.28%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

11.39%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

17.63%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

22.65%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

28.22%

-6.52%

XJR vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than AVUV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.63%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XJR and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJR has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to AVUV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.59% vs 6.15% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.96% for XJR.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer