XITK vs. XLF
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 13.96%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for XLF. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
XITK vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -1.56% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XITK at 13.96% and XLF at 13.96%.
XITK
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- -0.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
XLF
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -3.26%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
XITK vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 1.90% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -1.56% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and XLF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.45 |
The correlation between XITK and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XITK vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
XLF
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XITK
XLF
Communication Services
XITK
XLF
-
Healthcare
XITK
XLF
-
Industrials
XITK
XLF
Financial Services
XITK
XLF
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
XLF
-
Real Estate
XITK
XLF
-
Basic Materials
XITK
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
XLF
-
Energy
XITK
-
XLF
-
Utilities
XITK
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
XLF
XITK vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 0.38 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 0.96 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -82.69% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -14.79% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -15.54% | -12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -25.81% | -35.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -42.86% | -22.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.52% | -4.41% | -26.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -19.99% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 5.80% | +6.37% |
Volatility
XITK vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.19%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 4.19% | +8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.82% | 11.20% | +12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 14.50% | +13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 18.56% | +14.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 22.10% | +7.61% |
XITK vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.51% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and XLF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to XLF (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.96% vs 13.96% for XITK. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.08% for XLF.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer