XITK vs. SCAP
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and SCAP (Infracap Small Cap Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while SCAP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by InfraCap. XITK is passively managed, while SCAP is actively managed. Over the past year, XITK returned 1.26% vs 21.17% for SCAP. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SCAP.
Performance
XITK vs. SCAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than SCAP's 9.35% return.
XITK
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 1.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- -3.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.77%
SCAP
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $115.86K | $101.48K | $91.47K | |
| $94.40K | $185.95K | $342.96K |
XITK vs. SCAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 3.17% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 6.97% |
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 9.35% | 11.85% | 16.39% | 6.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and SCAP is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XITK and SCAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
XITK vs. SCAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
SCAP
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XITK
SCAP
Communication Services
XITK
SCAP
Industrials
XITK
SCAP
Financial Services
XITK
SCAP
Healthcare
XITK
SCAP
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
SCAP
Real Estate
XITK
SCAP
Basic Materials
XITK
-
SCAP
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
SCAP
Energy
XITK
-
SCAP
Utilities
XITK
-
SCAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. SCAP — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
SCAP
XITK vs. SCAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | SCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.21 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 1.75 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 5.70 | -5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. SCAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than SCAP's maximum drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and SCAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | SCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -24.13% | -41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -11.55% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.65% | -4.02% | -25.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -4.13% | -18.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.69% | 3.54% | +9.15% |
Volatility
XITK vs. SCAP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Infracap Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) at 4.87%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | SCAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 4.87% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.08% | 12.98% | +12.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.28% | 16.73% | +12.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.07% | 18.66% | +14.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.72% | 18.66% | +11.06% |
XITK vs. SCAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SCAP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. SCAP - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCAP Infracap Small Cap Income ETF | 7.35% | 6.71% | 6.89% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and SCAP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to SCAP (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs SCAP's -24.13%.
On 1-year performance, SCAP leads with 21.17% vs 1.26% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SCAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCAP has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 1.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SCAP.
SCAP has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCAP is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and InfraCap. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.80% for SCAP.
SCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and SCAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer