XLF vs. JPM
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.68%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for JPM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
XLF vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 13.68%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 21.92% annualized return.
XLF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
JPM
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- 20.01%
- 10Y*
- 21.92%
XLF vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -1.10% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3.87% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and JPM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XLF and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
JPM
XLF vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.49 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 3.50 | -2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -76.16% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -15.47% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -24.42% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -38.77% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -43.63% | +0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -0.59% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -17.61% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 6.55% | -0.77% |
Volatility
XLF vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.12%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.33% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 17.13% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 22.15% | -7.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 24.47% | -5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 27.44% | -5.26% |
Dividends
XLF vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than JPM's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.78% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.50% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLF and JPM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPM has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to XLF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs JPM's -76.16%.
JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer