XITK vs. VGT
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XITK tracks the FactSet Innovative Technology Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 14.35%/yr vs 25.78%/yr for VGT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
XITK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 14.35%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
XITK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 13.97% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and VGT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XITK and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
XITK vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XITK
VGT
Communication Services
XITK
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
VGT
Industrials
XITK
VGT
Financial Services
XITK
VGT
Healthcare
XITK
VGT
Real Estate
XITK
VGT
-
Basic Materials
XITK
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
VGT
-
Energy
XITK
-
VGT
Utilities
XITK
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
VGT
XITK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XITK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 2.95 | -2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 3.63 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 3.69 | -3.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 11.77 | -10.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XITK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 2.95 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.89 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 1.05 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
XITK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -54.63% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -16.40% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -27.23% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -35.07% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -35.07% | -30.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.29% | -1.48% | -20.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -7.95% | -14.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 5.13% | +6.83% |
Volatility
XITK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 6.39% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 16.07% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.50% | 20.57% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 25.18% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 24.60% | +4.97% |
XITK vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and VGT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.78% vs 14.35% for XITK. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer