PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLF vs. XLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and XLV is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

XLF vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
15.20%
-3.66%
XLF
XLV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLF:

2.31

XLV:

0.15

Sortino Ratio

XLF:

3.28

XLV:

0.27

Omega Ratio

XLF:

1.42

XLV:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

XLF:

4.53

XLV:

0.12

Martin Ratio

XLF:

13.45

XLV:

0.36

Ulcer Index

XLF:

2.50%

XLV:

4.56%

Daily Std Dev

XLF:

14.59%

XLV:

10.96%

Max Drawdown

XLF:

-82.43%

XLV:

-39.17%

Current Drawdown

XLF:

-3.21%

XLV:

-9.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 14.62%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


XLF

YTD

2.38%

1M

0.49%

6M

13.81%

1Y

34.59%

5Y*

12.01%

10Y*

14.62%

XLV

YTD

2.18%

1M

1.36%

6M

-5.85%

1Y

2.24%

5Y*

7.85%

10Y*

8.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLF vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expense ratio chart for XLF: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%
Expense ratio chart for XLV: current value at 0.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.12%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLF vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLV is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLV is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLV is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLV is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLV is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLV is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLF vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLF, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.310.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLF, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.280.27
The chart of Omega ratio for XLF, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.421.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLF, currently valued at 4.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.530.12
The chart of Martin ratio for XLF, currently valued at 13.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.450.36
XLF
XLV

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and XLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.31
0.15
XLF
XLV

Dividends

XLF vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than XLV's 1.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.39%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%
XLV
Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.63%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.58%1.47%1.60%1.43%1.35%

Drawdowns

XLF vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.43%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.21%
-9.86%
XLF
XLV

Volatility

XLF vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) at 3.72%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.64%
3.72%
XLF
XLV
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab