PortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. XLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and XLV is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XLF vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XLF:

1.14

XLV:

-0.54

Sortino Ratio

XLF:

1.48

XLV:

-0.71

Omega Ratio

XLF:

1.22

XLV:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

XLF:

1.32

XLV:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

XLF:

5.10

XLV:

-1.33

Ulcer Index

XLF:

4.02%

XLV:

7.11%

Daily Std Dev

XLF:

20.36%

XLV:

15.93%

Max Drawdown

XLF:

-82.43%

XLV:

-39.17%

Current Drawdown

XLF:

-3.75%

XLV:

-16.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 14.18%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.54% annualized return.


XLF

YTD

3.93%

1M

4.23%

6M

-0.56%

1Y

22.16%

3Y*

15.95%

5Y*

20.18%

10Y*

14.18%

XLV

YTD

-4.89%

1M

-5.58%

6M

-8.83%

1Y

-8.29%

3Y*

1.38%

5Y*

7.19%

10Y*

7.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLF vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLF vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLV is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLV is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLV is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLV is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLV is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLV is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLF vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and XLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

XLF vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than XLV's 1.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.42%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%
XLV
Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.79%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.58%1.47%1.60%1.43%1.35%

Drawdowns

XLF vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.43%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and XLV.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

XLF vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is 4.17%, while Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...