PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 12.53%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 23.46% annualized return.


XITK

1D
2.10%
1M
-2.48%
6M
11.87%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
1.26%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
-3.68%
10Y*
12.53%
ALL TIME*
13.77%

XNTK

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
23.46%
ALL TIME*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$94.40K$185.95K$342.96K
$14.59M$14.88M$19.50M

XITK vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
3.17%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
21.38%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and XNTK is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.82

The correlation between XITK and XNTK shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
XNTK

Technology

82.6%
85.8%

Communication Services

10.0%
7.2%

Industrials

2.1%

-

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Healthcare

1.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
7.0%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XITK
82.6%
XNTK
85.8%

Communication Services

XITK
10.0%
XNTK
7.2%

Industrials

XITK
2.1%
XNTK

-

Financial Services

XITK
2.0%
XNTK

-

Healthcare

XITK
1.9%
XNTK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
1.0%
XNTK
7.0%

Real Estate

XITK
0.4%
XNTK

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Energy

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XITK vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XITKXNTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.25

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

2.30

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.11

6.96

-7.07

XITK vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XITK vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-72.38%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-18.65%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-28.11%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-48.28%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-48.28%

-17.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.65%

-13.74%

-15.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-21.21%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

6.15%

+6.54%

Volatility

XITK vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is 9.22%, while State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that XITK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

11.16%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.08%

25.16%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.28%

29.41%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.07%

29.01%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.72%

27.17%

+2.55%

XITK vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and XNTK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to XITK (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 23.46% vs 12.53% for XITK. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XITK has been the lower-risk option at 9.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 23.46% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer