PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. XNTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. XNTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly lower than XNTK's 39.42% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed XNTK with an annualized return of 14.76%, while XNTK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.76% annualized return.


XITK

1D
-0.13%
1M
17.59%
YTD
18.12%
6M
19.40%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
14.76%

XNTK

1D
2.68%
1M
22.48%
YTD
39.42%
6M
38.46%
1Y
78.56%
3Y*
43.30%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
25.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. XNTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
18.12%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
39.42%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and XNTK is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.82

The correlation between XITK and XNTK shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. XNTK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
XNTK

Technology

83.4%
80.9%

Communication Services

8.6%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
9.3%

Industrials

2.0%

-

Financial Services

1.7%

-

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XITK
83.4%
XNTK
80.9%

Communication Services

XITK
8.6%
XNTK
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
2.2%
XNTK
9.3%

Industrials

XITK
2.0%
XNTK

-

Financial Services

XITK
1.7%
XNTK

-

Healthcare

XITK
1.6%
XNTK

-

Real Estate

XITK
0.5%
XNTK

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Energy

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Utilities

XITK

-

XNTK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. XNTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. XNTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XITKXNTKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

3.39

-2.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.98

-2.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.54

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

4.69

-4.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

15.66

-14.21

XITK vs. XNTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the XNTK Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and XNTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XITKXNTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

3.39

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.79

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.97

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Drawdowns

XITK vs. XNTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum XNTK drawdown of -72.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and XNTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKXNTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-72.38%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-17.00%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-28.11%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-48.28%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-48.28%

-17.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.46%

0.00%

-19.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.08%

-21.30%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.96%

5.09%

+6.87%

Volatility

XITK vs. XNTK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) have volatilities of 7.42% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKXNTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

7.52%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.56%

18.05%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

23.29%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.61%

27.91%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.55%

26.64%

+2.91%

XITK vs. XNTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XNTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. XNTK - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and XNTK have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to XITK (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs XNTK's -72.38%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.76% vs 14.76% for XITK. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XITK has been the lower-risk option at 7.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.76% return vs 14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.35% for XNTK.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and XNTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer