PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. ARKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 13.63%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.53% annualized return.


XITK

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
8.03%
6M
5.41%
1Y
7.89%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
-3.04%
10Y*
13.63%

ARKW

1D
-1.79%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-4.76%
6M
-7.39%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
36.73%
5Y*
-1.21%
10Y*
22.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
8.03%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
-4.76%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and ARKW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.87

The correlation between XITK and ARKW shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
ARKW

Technology

82.4%
44.0%

Communication Services

10.4%
14.6%

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Industrials

1.6%
4.9%

Financial Services

1.3%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
14.4%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XITK
82.4%
ARKW
44.0%

Communication Services

XITK
10.4%
ARKW
14.6%

Healthcare

XITK
3.1%
ARKW

-

Industrials

XITK
1.6%
ARKW
4.9%

Financial Services

XITK
1.3%
ARKW
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
0.8%
ARKW
14.4%

Real Estate

XITK
0.4%
ARKW

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Energy

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Utilities

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XITKARKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

-0.02

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

-0.04

+0.69

XITK vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XITK vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and ARKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKARKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-80.52%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-36.21%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-36.21%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-77.36%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-80.52%

+14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.34%

-23.67%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-23.97%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.09%

18.14%

-6.05%

Volatility

XITK vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 11.08%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKARKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.38%

11.08%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.61%

24.74%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.84%

32.81%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

43.66%

-10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.70%

37.78%

-8.08%

XITK vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.67%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and ARKW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XITK has higher volatility (12.38%) compared to ARKW (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs ARKW's -80.52%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.53% vs 13.63% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 11.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.53% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.76% for ARKW.

XITK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and ARKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer