PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. ARKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's 2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 14.76%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 23.36% annualized return.


XITK

1D
-0.13%
1M
17.59%
YTD
18.12%
6M
19.40%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
14.76%

ARKW

1D
-2.02%
1M
7.88%
YTD
2.26%
6M
1.10%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
41.54%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
23.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
18.12%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
2.26%38.93%42.27%96.89%-67.49%-18.85%157.44%35.76%4.24%87.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and ARKW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.87

The correlation between XITK and ARKW shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
ARKW

Technology

83.4%
44.2%

Communication Services

8.6%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
16.3%

Industrials

2.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

1.7%
14.2%

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XITK
83.4%
ARKW
44.2%

Communication Services

XITK
8.6%
ARKW
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
2.2%
ARKW
16.3%

Industrials

XITK
2.0%
ARKW
1.7%

Financial Services

XITK
1.7%
ARKW
14.2%

Healthcare

XITK
1.6%
ARKW

-

Real Estate

XITK
0.5%
ARKW

-

Basic Materials

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Energy

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Utilities

XITK

-

ARKW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKW
ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XITKARKWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.80

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.25

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.75

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

1.55

-0.10

XITK vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XITKARKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.80

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.06

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

XITK vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and ARKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKARKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-80.52%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-36.21%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-36.21%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-77.36%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-80.52%

+14.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.46%

-18.04%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.08%

-23.98%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.96%

17.48%

-5.52%

Volatility

XITK vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) have volatilities of 7.42% and 7.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKARKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

7.45%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.56%

23.42%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.26%

32.80%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.61%

43.49%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.55%

37.69%

-8.14%

XITK vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKW
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
1.56%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%1.29%0.00%13.05%2.05%0.00%2.29%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and ARKW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKW has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to XITK (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs ARKW's -80.52%.

On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 23.36% vs 14.76% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 23.36% return vs 14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.76% for ARKW.

ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and ARKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer