XITK vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XITK is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

XITK vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XITK

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: 12.45%
• YTD: 13.97%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: -0.31%
• 10Y*: 14.35%

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	2.59%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

XITK vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK

XITK Risk / Return Rank: 15
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XITK	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XITK	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	471,500.14	-471,499.63

Drawdowns

XITK vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XITK	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-1.61%	-63.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.29%	0.00%	-22.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.08%	-0.40%	-21.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XITK	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.87%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.50%	113.00%	-86.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.63%	113.00%	-80.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.57%	113.00%	-83.43%

XITK vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XITK vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither XITK nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.11%	0.00%	0.06%	0.14%	1.50%	1.74%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XITK and ARMH in my portfolio?

XITK and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XITK or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XITK or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XITK or ARMH?

XITK and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XITK and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.19% for ARMH.