XIFR vs. ALB
XIFR (XPLR Infrastructure LP) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. XIFR operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while ALB operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, XIFR returned -4.78%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for ALB. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
XIFR vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIFR achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XIFR has underperformed ALB with an annualized return of -4.78%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively higher 5.31% annualized return.
XIFR
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 28.15%
- 3Y*
- -34.83%
- 5Y*
- -28.29%
- 10Y*
- -4.78%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.96%
ALB
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- 6M
- -28.84%
- YTD
- -14.15%
- 1Y
- 78.61%
- 3Y*
- -14.17%
- 5Y*
- -10.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $271.97M | $255.06M | $354.37M | |
| $17.05M | $14.22M | $13.09M |
XIFR vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIFR XPLR Infrastructure LP | 17.90% | -43.82% | -32.61% | -53.32% | -13.52% | 30.01% | 32.40% | 27.54% | 3.74% | 75.99% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | -14.15% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIFR and ALB is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2014 | 0.28 |
The correlation between XIFR and ALB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XIFR:
$1.11B
ALB:
$14.25B
XIFR:
$0.67
ALB:
-$2.33
XIFR:
0.92
ALB:
2.59
XIFR:
0.10
ALB:
1.88
XIFR:
$1.20B
ALB:
$5.49B
XIFR:
$208.00M
ALB:
$1.02B
XIFR:
$741.00M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIFR vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
XIFR
ALB
XIFR vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPLR Infrastructure LP (XIFR) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIFR | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 4.45 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIFR vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIFR drawdown since its inception was -88.29%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIFR and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIFR | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.29% | -83.90% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.45% | -47.38% | +26.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.45% | -74.05% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.29% | -83.90% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.29% | -83.90% | -4.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.66% | -60.92% | -21.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.62% | -20.84% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.22% | 17.72% | -8.50% |
Volatility
XIFR vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
XPLR Infrastructure LP (XIFR) has a higher volatility of 13.96% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 9.21%. This indicates that XIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIFR | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.96% | 9.21% | +4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.43% | 40.52% | -13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.64% | 59.33% | -20.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.57% | 54.70% | -9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.83% | 48.45% | -7.62% |
Dividends
XIFR vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
XIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.34% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
XIFR XPLR Infrastructure LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.20% | 11.10% | 4.27% | 3.08% | 3.37% | 3.74% | 3.98% | 3.46% | 5.08% | 3.03% |
Financials
XIFR vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPLR Infrastructure LP and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XIFR vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
XIFR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported a gross profit of 219.00M and revenue of 363.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
XIFR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported an operating income of 60.00M and revenue of 363.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
XIFR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported a net income of 38.00M and revenue of 363.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XIFR and ALB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XIFR has higher volatility (13.96%) compared to ALB (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIFR dropped -88.29% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIFR and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer