PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIFR vs. BLNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XIFR vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XPLR Infrastructure LP (XIFR) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIFR achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than BLNK's -15.95% return.


XIFR

1D
-0.76%
1M
-4.53%
6M
19.57%
YTD
17.90%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
-34.83%
5Y*
-28.29%
10Y*
-4.78%
ALL TIME*
-3.96%

BLNK

1D
3.28%
1M
-10.75%
6M
-20.80%
YTD
-15.95%
1Y
-41.62%
3Y*
-55.14%
5Y*
-56.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-27.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$751.21K$651.00K$1.48M
$17.05M$14.22M$13.09M

XIFR vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XIFR
XPLR Infrastructure LP
17.90%-43.82%-32.61%-53.32%-13.52%30.01%32.40%27.54%12.47%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
-15.95%-52.01%-59.00%-69.10%-58.62%-37.99%2,198.39%8.14%-80.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XIFR and BLNK is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2018

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XIFR:

$1.11B

BLNK:

$66.90M

EPS

XIFR:

$0.67

BLNK:

-$0.60

PS Ratio

XIFR:

0.92

BLNK:

0.67

PB Ratio

XIFR:

0.10

BLNK:

1.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

XIFR:

$1.20B

BLNK:

$103.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XIFR:

$208.00M

BLNK:

$24.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

XIFR:

$741.00M

BLNK:

-$58.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIFR vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XIFR
XIFR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNK
BLNK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XIFR vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPLR Infrastructure LP (XIFR) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIFRBLNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.51

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

-0.69

+3.76

XIFR vs. BLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the BLNK Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIFR and BLNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIFR vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIFR drawdown since its inception was -88.29%, smaller than the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIFR and BLNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIFRBLNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.29%

-99.23%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.45%

-81.20%

+60.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.45%

-93.15%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.29%

-99.00%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.66%

-99.08%

+16.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.62%

-73.89%

+44.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.22%

60.15%

-50.93%

Volatility

XIFR vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for XPLR Infrastructure LP (XIFR) is 13.96%, while Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) has a volatility of 20.98%. This indicates that XIFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIFRBLNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

20.98%

-7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.43%

57.67%

-30.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.64%

94.05%

-55.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.57%

83.22%

-37.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.83%

120.57%

-79.74%

Dividends

XIFR vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither XIFR nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIFR
XPLR Infrastructure LP
0.00%0.00%20.20%11.10%4.27%3.08%3.37%3.74%3.98%3.46%5.08%3.03%

Financials

XIFR vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPLR Infrastructure LP and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

XIFR vs. BLNK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between XPLR Infrastructure LP and Blink Charging Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

XIFR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported a gross profit of 219.00M and revenue of 363.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

BLNK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a gross profit of 6.64M and revenue of 20.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.0%.

XIFR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported an operating income of 60.00M and revenue of 363.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

BLNK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported an operating income of -11.78M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.7%.

XIFR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, XPLR Infrastructure LP reported a net income of 38.00M and revenue of 363.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

BLNK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a net income of -11.56M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in a net margin of -55.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XIFR and BLNK have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNK has higher volatility (20.98%) compared to XIFR (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIFR dropped -88.29% vs BLNK's -99.23%.

XIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIFR and BLNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer