XHS vs. XLVI
XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. XHS is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XHS vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's 2.50% return.
XHS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
XLVI
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHS vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 15.40% | 18.54% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.50% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and XLVI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
XHS vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHS
XLVI
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XHS
XLVI
Financial Services
XHS
XLVI
Basic Materials
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Energy
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Industrials
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Technology
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
XHS
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHS vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
XHS
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XHS vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHS | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHS vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHS | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -8.14% | -31.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.97% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -1.94% | -8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility
XHS vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHS | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 11.06% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 11.06% | +10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 11.06% | +11.34% |
XHS vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XHS and XLVI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XHS vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than XLVI's 11.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.17% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHS and XLVI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHS and XLVI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.17%, compared with 0.22% for XHS.
XHS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for XHS and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer