XHS vs. SPY
XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XHS returned 8.61%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
XHS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XHS has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.61%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
XHS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
XHS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 15.40% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | 9.76% | 33.66% | 18.81% | 1.96% | 17.65% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and SPY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHS and SPY has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHS
SPY
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XHS
SPY
Financial Services
XHS
SPY
Basic Materials
XHS
-
SPY
Communication Services
XHS
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
XHS
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
XHS
-
SPY
Energy
XHS
-
SPY
Industrials
XHS
-
SPY
Real Estate
XHS
-
SPY
Technology
XHS
-
SPY
Utilities
XHS
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
XHS
SPY
XHS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XHS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.67 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 11.92 | -5.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XHS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -55.19% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.99% | -8.88% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -18.76% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | -24.50% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | -33.72% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.17% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -9.04% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 1.98% | +2.34% |
Volatility
XHS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) is 4.47%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that XHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.87% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 9.85% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 12.50% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 17.15% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 17.95% | +4.45% |
XHS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHS and SPY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to XHS (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHS dropped -39.32% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 8.61% for XHS. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XHS has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHS.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.22% for XHS.
XHS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer