XHS vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV).
XHS and XLV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both XHS and XLV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XHS or XLV.
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and XLV is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XHS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XHS:
0.66
XLV:
0.20
XHS:
1.05
XLV:
0.34
XHS:
1.12
XLV:
1.04
XHS:
0.45
XLV:
0.17
XHS:
2.46
XLV:
0.46
XHS:
4.58%
XLV:
4.64%
XHS:
17.11%
XLV:
10.97%
XHS:
-39.32%
XLV:
-39.17%
XHS:
-15.92%
XLV:
-10.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XHS has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 6.20%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.
XHS
6.83%
6.87%
3.33%
10.76%
5.06%
6.20%
XLV
1.90%
2.54%
-4.42%
2.17%
7.77%
8.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XHS vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XHS
XLV
XHS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XHS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.29% | 0.92% | 1.17% |
XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.64% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
XHS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, roughly equal to the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XHS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) at 3.59%. This indicates that XHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.