XHS vs. FHLC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC).
XHS and FHLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XHS and FHLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XHS or FHLC.
Performance
XHS vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XHS has underperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 6.14%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.
XHS
3.85%
-4.20%
0.45%
9.83%
5.90%
6.14%
FHLC
5.11%
-7.26%
-1.49%
13.47%
8.87%
9.20%
Key characteristics
| XHS | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.01 | 1.69 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.40 | 1.26 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.75 | 5.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.92% | 2.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.33% | 11.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.32% | -28.76% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.68% | -9.04% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHS vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between XHS and FHLC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XHS vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XHS vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FHLC's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.33% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.29% | 0.92% | 1.17% | 0.46% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% | 1.03% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
XHS vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and FHLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XHS vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 3.76%. This indicates that XHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.