XES vs. XOP
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from State Street - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -2.41%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for XOP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XES vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 36.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed XOP with an annualized return of -2.41%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively higher 3.80% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 51.54%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- 106.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
XOP
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 41.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
XES vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 51.54% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 36.08% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and XOP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XES and XOP has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XES vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
XOP
Energy
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XES
XOP
Industrials
XES
XOP
-
Basic Materials
XES
-
XOP
Communication Services
XES
-
XOP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
XOP
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
XOP
-
Financial Services
XES
-
XOP
-
Healthcare
XES
-
XOP
-
Real Estate
XES
-
XOP
-
Technology
XES
-
XOP
-
Utilities
XES
-
XOP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
XES
XOP
XES vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XES | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | 1.51 | +2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 2.00 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.25 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.21 | 2.77 | +8.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.56 | 7.10 | +23.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XES | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 1.51 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.44 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.09 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.06 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
XES vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than XOP's maximum drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -90.27% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -15.14% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -34.98% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -34.98% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -82.61% | -8.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.73% | -36.40% | -34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.36% | -42.59% | -11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 5.90% | -2.29% |
Volatility
XES vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is 8.25%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that XES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 10.03% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | 21.64% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 27.81% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 33.88% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 40.28% | +4.77% |
XES vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XES and XOP have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XES vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XOP's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.12% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.90% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and XOP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to XES (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs XOP's -90.27%.
On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.80% vs -2.41% for XES. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XES has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.80% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES and XOP have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.12% for XES.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer