PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 36.79% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of -3.36%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.


XES

1D
-2.00%
1M
5.52%
6M
9.93%
YTD
36.79%
1Y
70.69%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*
-3.36%
ALL TIME*
-3.54%

TPYP

1D
-1.47%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.96%
YTD
20.31%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.68M$2.32M$2.66M
$5.95M$7.55M$11.49M

XES vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
36.79%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.31%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and TPYP is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between XES and TPYP has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XES vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
TPYP

Energy

97.7%
69.6%

Industrials

2.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

21.2%

Energy

XES
97.7%
TPYP
69.6%

Industrials

XES
2.3%
TPYP
0.1%

Basic Materials

XES

-

TPYP
0.1%

Communication Services

XES

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

TPYP

-

Financial Services

XES

-

TPYP
2.4%

Healthcare

XES

-

TPYP

-

Real Estate

XES

-

TPYP

-

Technology

XES

-

TPYP

-

Utilities

XES

-

TPYP
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XES vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.25

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

7.64

+2.59

XES vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-51.91%

-43.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.48%

-6.84%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-13.17%

-32.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-17.96%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-51.91%

-39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.58%

-5.54%

-68.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.51%

-7.82%

-46.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

2.91%

+4.03%

Volatility

XES vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

4.74%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.84%

11.18%

+10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.56%

13.98%

+16.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.53%

17.41%

+21.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.86%

21.90%

+22.96%

XES vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.28%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.17%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and TPYP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.32% vs -3.36% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.32% return vs -3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.17% for XES.

XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.40% for TPYP.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer