TPYP vs. AMLP
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPYP returned 11.93%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for AMLP. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
TPYP vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 11.93%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.76% annualized return.
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
TPYP vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.07% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.31% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and AMLP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TPYP and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
TPYP vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPYP
AMLP
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
TPYP
AMLP
Utilities
TPYP
AMLP
Financial Services
TPYP
AMLP
-
Basic Materials
TPYP
AMLP
-
Communication Services
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Healthcare
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Industrials
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Real Estate
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Technology
TPYP
-
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
AMLP
TPYP vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPYP | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.45 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.03 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 1.92 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 6.37 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPYP | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.45 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.85 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.24 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -77.19% | +25.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -8.94% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -14.27% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -20.92% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | -72.62% | +20.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -4.10% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -17.40% | +9.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.68% | -0.12% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.91%. This indicates that TPYP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 4.91% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 8.66% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 11.90% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 19.98% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 27.68% | -5.74% |
TPYP vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than AMLP's 7.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.64% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and AMLP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to AMLP (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs 6.76% for AMLP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.
TPYP is categorized as Energy Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.90% for AMLP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer