TPYP vs. UMI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and UMI (USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TPYP is passively managed, while UMI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPYP returned 17.96%/yr vs 20.20%/yr for UMI. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UMI.

Performance

TPYP vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 21.76% return.

TPYP

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: 20.05%
• 6M: 21.48%
• 1Y: 23.32%
• 3Y*: 25.65%
• 5Y*: 17.96%
• 10Y*: 11.74%

UMI

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 6M: 23.01%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 27.84%
• 5Y*: 20.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPYP vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	20.05%	7.59%	37.37%	10.51%	16.09%	34.97%	-20.99%	23.35%	-11.13%	5.70%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	21.76%	5.11%	42.97%	14.60%	20.78%	20.97%	-8.25%	21.06%	-10.64%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and UMI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017	0.78

The correlation between TPYP and UMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPYP vs. UMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPYP	UMI
Energy	68.8%	99.0%
Utilities	22.0%	1.0%
Financial Services	2.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

TPYP vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPYP

TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 55
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 51

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 54
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPYP vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPYP	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.73	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.40	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.28	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.48	8.47	+0.01

TPYP vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPYP	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.91%	-48.08%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.84%	-7.50%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.17%	-17.08%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.96%	-20.05%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	-5.35%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.88%	-6.59%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.90%	-0.14%

Volatility

TPYP vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) have volatilities of 5.08% and 5.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPYP	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	5.33%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	11.05%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	14.23%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	19.45%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.93%	23.16%	-1.23%

TPYP vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPYP vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than UMI's 6.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	3.25%	3.91%	3.95%	4.83%	4.48%	4.86%	6.14%	4.45%	4.58%	3.71%	3.49%	2.56%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	6.02%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPYP and UMI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TPYP and UMI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TPYP or UMI?

UMI has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to TPYP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs UMI's -48.08%.

Which ETF is better, TPYP or UMI?

On 5-year performance, UMI leads with 20.20% vs 17.96% for TPYP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPYP or UMI?

Over the 5-year period, UMI has performed better with a 20.20% return vs 17.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPYP or UMI?

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPYP or UMI?

UMI has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 3.25% for TPYP.

What is the main difference between TPYP and UMI?

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.85% for UMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.