PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of -2.41%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.


XES

1D
2.58%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
51.54%
6M
51.49%
1Y
106.77%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
-2.41%

SPYM

1D
0.12%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.72%
6M
12.10%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
51.54%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and SPYM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between XES and SPYM has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XES vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
SPYM

Energy

97.5%
3.2%

Industrials

2.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Energy

XES
97.5%
SPYM
3.2%

Industrials

XES
2.5%
SPYM
7.6%

Basic Materials

XES

-

SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

XES

-

SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

SPYM
4.6%

Financial Services

XES

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

XES

-

SPYM
8.4%

Real Estate

XES

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

XES

-

SPYM
38.5%

Utilities

XES

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESSPYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.52

2.54

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

3.44

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.21

3.42

+7.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.56

15.95

+14.61

XES vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

2.54

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.85

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.88

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.62

-0.69

Drawdowns

XES vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-54.46%

-41.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-8.90%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-18.72%

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-24.48%

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-33.87%

-57.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.73%

0.00%

-70.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.36%

-7.15%

-47.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.91%

+1.70%

Volatility

XES vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.74%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

2.74%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

8.89%

+11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

11.78%

+18.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

16.80%

+22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.05%

18.01%

+27.04%

XES vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
0.99%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and SPYM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to SPYM (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.70% vs -2.41% for XES. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.70% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.

XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.02% for SPYM.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer