SPYM vs. SCHG
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.61%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SPYM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.61%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
SPYM vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SPYM and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYM vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
SCHG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYM
SCHG
Financial Services
SPYM
SCHG
Communication Services
SPYM
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
SCHG
Healthcare
SPYM
SCHG
Industrials
SPYM
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
SCHG
Energy
SPYM
SCHG
Utilities
SPYM
SCHG
Real Estate
SPYM
SCHG
Basic Materials
SPYM
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
SCHG
SPYM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.10 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 3.58 | +8.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -34.59% | -19.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -16.41% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -23.39% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -34.59% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -34.59% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -6.46% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -5.20% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 5.02% | -3.03% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 4.83%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 5.91% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 12.52% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 16.24% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 22.38% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 21.58% | -3.55% |
SPYM vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPYM and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 15.61% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.04% for SCHG.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer