PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.15%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
0.68%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.55%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
11.17%

SCHG

1D
1.12%
1M
0.15%
6M
7.02%
YTD
4.99%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
18.27%
ALL TIME*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$247.66M$249.87M$339.91M
$811.10M$977.30M$1.09B

SPYM vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.15%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.99%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SCHG is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.87

The correlation between SPYM and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYM vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SCHG

Technology

38.5%
44.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
7.7%

Communication Services

9.9%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
11.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.9%

Industrials

8.4%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.9%

Energy

3.0%
0.9%

Utilities

2.2%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.6%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
SCHG
44.0%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.6%
SCHG
7.7%

Communication Services

SPYM
9.9%
SCHG
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.5%
SCHG
11.2%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.9%
SCHG
9.9%

Industrials

SPYM
8.4%
SCHG
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
SCHG
1.9%

Energy

SPYM
3.0%
SCHG
0.9%

Utilities

SPYM
2.2%
SCHG
0.5%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SCHG
0.6%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SCHG
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.83

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

2.62

+6.82

SPYM vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-34.59%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.41%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-23.39%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-34.59%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-34.59%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-3.10%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-5.19%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

5.19%

-3.11%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.48%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

4.32%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

12.90%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

16.67%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

22.42%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.59%

-3.58%

SPYM vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPYM and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to SPYM (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.27% vs 15.15% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.27% return vs 15.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.04% for SCHG.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer