PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 15.52%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.42%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.52%

SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.10%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SPYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.85

The correlation between SPYM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SPYG

Technology

39.0%
53.2%

Financial Services

11.1%
8.4%

Communication Services

10.6%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
5.8%

Industrials

7.8%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.9%

Energy

3.1%
0.1%

Utilities

2.1%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.3%

Technology

SPYM
39.0%
SPYG
53.2%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.1%
SPYG
8.4%

Communication Services

SPYM
10.6%
SPYG
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.9%
SPYG
8.5%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.3%
SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

SPYM
7.8%
SPYG
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
SPYG
0.9%

Energy

SPYM
3.1%
SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

SPYM
2.1%
SPYG
1.1%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SPYG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SPYG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.01

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

8.08

+4.34

SPYM vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-67.63%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-13.76%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-22.14%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-32.67%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-32.67%

-1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-4.65%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-24.30%

+17.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.42%

-1.45%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 4.33%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

6.33%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

13.48%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

16.81%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

21.27%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

20.70%

-2.67%

SPYM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPYM and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SPYM (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 15.52% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 15.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer