XES vs. LNGX
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
XES vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than LNGX's 19.55% return.
XES
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 51.54%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- 106.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XES vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 51.54% | 1.19% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 19.55% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and LNGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
XES
LNGX
XES vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XES | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.52 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.21 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XES | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 2.03 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
XES vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -14.31% | -81.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.73% | -12.03% | -58.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.36% | -4.32% | -50.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility
XES vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 24.75% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 24.75% | +14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 24.75% | +20.30% |
XES vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.12% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and LNGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for XES and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer