LNGX vs. NBET

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while NBET is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. LNGX is passively managed, while NBET is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NBET.

Performance

LNGX vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 22.02% return, which is significantly lower than NBET's 24.97% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 8.11%
• 6M: 12.58%
• YTD: 22.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NBET

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 3.95%
• 6M: 14.68%
• YTD: 24.97%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	$559.43K	$459.98K	$618.90K
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	$197.04K	$221.77K	$179.90K

LNGX vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	22.02%	5.29%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	24.97%	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and NBET is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LNGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 74
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LNGX vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LNGX	NBET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.03	—

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, roughly equal to the maximum NBET drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and NBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	NBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.89%	-18.72%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.22%	-3.76%	-6.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-5.06%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	NBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.06%	14.92%	+10.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.06%	19.43%	+5.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.06%	19.43%	+5.63%

LNGX vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than NBET's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.81%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	2.41%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and NBET in my portfolio?

LNGX and NBET have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or NBET?

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or NBET?

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for NBET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or NBET?

NBET has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.81% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and NBET?

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while NBET is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.65% for NBET.