PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNGX vs. PSCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNGX vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 22.02% return, which is significantly lower than PSCE's 35.93% return.


LNGX

1D
1.79%
1M
8.11%
6M
12.58%
YTD
22.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PSCE

1D
1.76%
1M
7.67%
6M
15.91%
YTD
35.93%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
-1.41%
ALL TIME*
-3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$559.43K$459.98K$618.90K
$1.43M$1.38M$1.78M

LNGX vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LNGX
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF
22.02%5.29%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
35.93%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and PSCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNGX vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LNGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PSCE
PSCE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LNGX vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNGXPSCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

LNGX vs. PSCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and PSCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGXPSCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.89%

-96.21%

+78.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

-75.85%

+65.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-58.99%

+52.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

Volatility

LNGX vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGXPSCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.06%

27.41%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

36.95%

-11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

43.02%

-17.96%

LNGX vs. PSCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNGX vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than PSCE's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LNGX
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF
0.81%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
2.22%2.39%1.70%2.57%1.70%0.46%0.87%0.14%0.22%0.04%0.22%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


LNGX and PSCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.

PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.81% for LNGX.

LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.29% for PSCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNGX and PSCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer