LNGX vs. PSCE
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index while PSCE tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCE.
Performance
LNGX vs. PSCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than PSCE's 32.36% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- 32.36%
- 6M
- 31.96%
- 1Y
- 45.44%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
LNGX vs. PSCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 14.75% | 5.29% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 32.36% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and PSCE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. PSCE — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCE
LNGX vs. PSCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGX | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. PSCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum PSCE drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and PSCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -96.21% | +78.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -76.48% | +60.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -58.87% | +53.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.15% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. PSCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | PSCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 27.51% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 37.39% | -12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 43.20% | -18.31% |
LNGX vs. PSCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. PSCE - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than PSCE's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.28% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and PSCE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.23% for LNGX.
LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.29% for PSCE.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and PSCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer